only sustained because there are people who are willing to 
fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down 
their lives for it.  Our country is only as strong as the 
character of our people and the service of those both 
civilian and military who represent us around the globe.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great 
nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the 
values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans 
who represent the very best of the United States of America.  
We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is 
done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice 
will be done.
But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in 
stark contrast to those of their attackers.  These four 
Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity.  They 
should give every American great pride in the country that 
they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people 
around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with 
dignity.
Republicans are claiming that Obama’s reference to “acts of 
terror” was a generalized reference to terrorism with no 
specific application to Benghazi, which earlier in his 
statement Obama had called “this outrageous and shocking 
attack,” without using the word “terror.” But the 
reference to “four more Americans” in the very next 
sentence strongly suggests that Obama was applying the label 
to Benghazi. If you’re willing to grant that the debate’s 
moderator, Candy Crowley (no relation!), had a right to 
intervene at all, it’s hard to complain about her coming to 
Obama’s defense on this narrow point.
(MORE: Obama Campaign Bullish after Strong Second Debate)